pam_krb5 port question

[Lewis Thompson]

On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 08:00:54AM -0700, Jon Passki wrote:
> --- Lewis Thompson <purple at lewiz.net> wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 09, 2003 at 03:07:17AM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> > > Jon Passki wrote:
> > > >Is there any reason why the port is mainly focused for MIT
> > > >Kerberos and not Heimdal?
> > >
> > > KRB5_IMPL=heimdail didn't help? If so, it'll be great if you fix
> > > this and send a patch to the port maintainer.
> >
> > I'm personally not skilled enough to do it (well, not skilled...  I
> > just wouldn't know how) but I'd really like to see this use the
> > Heimdal Kerberos provided in the base system.
>
> My understanding is that the base systems builds pam_krb5 on -STABLE.

Aha!  Me being a bit stupid again, I should really have thought of
something like that.  Thanks very much, I've been looking at this on and
off for a while ;)

  Best wishes,

-lewiz.

-- 
I was so much older then, I'm younger than that now.  --Bob Dylan, 1964.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
-| msn:purple at lewiz.net | jab:lewiz at jabber.org | url:http://lewiz.net |-
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030909/6abc3e8d/attachment.bin