ghostscript commits (fix of back out request)

KATO Tsuguru tkato at prontomail.com
Sun Jun 8 01:31:41 PDT 2003


On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 00:33:09 -0700
Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> wrote:

> As far as I can tell, just having the package installed doesn't bring
> any new features to the system unless you choose to configure your
> system to use CUPS for printing instead of the default lpr.  As such,
> I think it's something that should be off by default.

Well, necessary part of CUPS is just the headers and
shared libraries in print/cups-base. print/cups-lpr
isn't required unless you really want to print with
entire CUPS environment. You normally don't have to
aware existence of CUPS and work with default lpr.

> I recommend making !CUPS the default, and adding a WITH_CUPS knob, or
> a ghostscript-gnu-cups slave port if necessary.

As far as the difference is only dependency of one
or two shared libraries, increasing numbers of slave
ports might be a bad idea for me. In addtion, I
personally think that shared library support shouldn't
be disabled by default if there is no paticular reason.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list