ghostscript commits (fix of back out request)

Jeremy Messenger mezz7 at cox.net
Sat Jun 7 21:16:16 PDT 2003


On Sat, 7 Jun 2003 20:42:54 -0700, Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> 
wrote:

> On Sun, Jun 08, 2003 at 03:01:30AM +0000, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>> KATO Tsuguru <tkato at prontomail.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Latest patch in ports/52479 (for ghostscript-afpl) and
>> > ports/52480 (for ghostscript-gnu) contains fix for this
>> > issue by replacing GS_OPTIONS in scripts/configure with
>> > GS_DRIVERS_LIST.
>>
>> The ghostscript-gnu update also incorporates cups-pstoraster and
>> thus supersedes the existing print/cups-pstoraster port.  It also
>> adds a default dependency on cups to ghostscript.
>>
>> If somebody disagrees with this, speak up now!
>
> Why is cups required?  I'd prefer not to have ghostscript suck in this
> package unless I need it.

I agree, cups should be optional if one of us want to enable it.

Cheers,
Mezz

> Kris


-- 
bsdforums.org 's moderator, mezz.


More information about the freebsd-ports mailing list