A different approach for the ghostscript problem
rehsack at liwing.de
Sun Jul 27 15:33:32 PDT 2003
On 28.07.2003 00:12, Tilman Linneweh wrote:
> * Jens Rehsack [So, 27 Jul 2003 at 23:59 GMT]:
>> This patch allows the admin of the machine to choose either
>> print/ghostscript-gnu or print/ghostscript-afpl
> Just picking a random PR.
> Instead of adding knobs to every port, a more
> generic solution might be appropriate, e.g. a bsd.port.mk patch.
> Oh, and I am not the first one with this idea.
> PR 36112 by lev tries to introduce a IMHO better solution.
I thought about including WITHOUT_X11 in any of the
a) I want to see the generic response of the port
b) Playing aroung (because having problem to create
useful and senseful patch, because it seems a little
bit more complecated) with print/cups-pstoraster
c) wasn't sure to use Mk/bsd.port.mk or a solution like
lang/php4 has: print/ghostscript/bsd.ghostschript.mk,
maybe with some more common in a Makefile for
all ghostscript derivates ...
PS: Your suggestions are very welcome - you can mail me!
in german, too :-)
More information about the freebsd-ports