ports/foo/nut conflict ?
DougB at FreeBSD.org
Wed Jul 9 12:56:53 PDT 2003
On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Morton Lin wrote:
> Hi, Sir :
> There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree.
I objected to this at the time, and was told it wasn't a big deal.
> 1) ports/misc/nut/
> (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw
> its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something
> like that ? )
> 2) ports/sysutils/nut/
> Should we make some differences between them ?
> BTW, ports gd2 was already upgraded by maintainer.
> Is there any plan to upgrade ports/sysutils/nut to fix
> the "make cgi" broken problem?
The last time I tried this with a new version, it still didn't work.
They are releasing new versions of nut with a fairly high regularity, so
I'm still trying them to find one that works.
This .signature sanitized for your protection
More information about the freebsd-ports