ports/foo/nut conflict ?

[Doug Barton]

On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Morton Lin wrote:

> Hi, Sir :
>
> There were two named "nut" ports in the ports tree.

I objected to this at the time, and was told it wasn't a big deal.

> 1) ports/misc/nut/
>     (from http://www.freebsd.org/ports/misc.html I saw
>      its name should be "health-nut-8.8" or something
>      like that ? )
> 2) ports/sysutils/nut/
>
> Should we make some differences between them ?
>
> BTW, ports gd2 was already upgraded by maintainer.
> Is there any plan to upgrade ports/sysutils/nut to fix
> the "make cgi" broken problem?

The last time I tried this with a new version, it still didn't work.
They are releasing new versions of nut with a fairly high regularity, so
I'm still trying them to find one that works.

Doug

-- 

    This .signature sanitized for your protection