kris at obsecurity.org
Tue Apr 22 17:26:37 PDT 2003
On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 01:29:04PM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * Kris Kennaway <kris at obsecurity.org> [030422 10:32] wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 22, 2003 at 10:13:03AM -0700, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> > > Just wanted to say thanks for one of the coolest programs ever. I
> > > just wish there was a way to get it to skip (use the default) the
> > > configuration screen for samba and ghostscript and whatnot.
> > bsd.port.mk tests the BATCH variable to skip interactive ports. See
> > the comments in that file.
> Wouldn't it make sense for it to set that when run with -a?
That might be a reasonable thing to do. I always forget this as well
and come back the next day to find that portupgrade upgraded 2 ports
and then hit an interactive one.
> Unless some other "do interactive" flag was set? It would be cool
> if there was a way for ports to remeber/inherit previous configs
> done when installed or upgraded and just use those.
I have patches :-)
P.S. I think we can stop CC'ing kan at this point and switch over to
the real portupgrade maintainer :)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/attachments/20030422/4c493c4a/attachment.bin
More information about the freebsd-ports