[Bug 199995] sysutils/puppet -- the 'Service' provider will get service names wrong when rc scripts contain a 'desc' parameter
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Wed May 6 14:24:38 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199995
Bug ID: 199995
Summary: sysutils/puppet -- the 'Service' provider will get
service names wrong when rc scripts contain a 'desc'
parameter
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Some People
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: swills at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: matthew at FreeBSD.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(swills at FreeBSD.org)
Assignee: swills at FreeBSD.org
Created attachment 156427
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=156427&action=edit
Update to sysutils/puppet
puppet groks the 'service_name' parameter by parsing the output of 'service foo
rcvar'. Normall this works well, but in the case of eg. local_unbound, it goes
comically wrong:
{{{
:% service local_unbound rcvar
# local_unbound : local caching forwarding resolver
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
#
local_unbound_enable="NO"
# (default: "")
}}}
The indicated text comes from the 'desc' variable in /etc/rc.d/local_unbound,
and leads to puppet creating a file '/etc/rc.conf.d/local_unbound : local
caching forwarding resolver' (embedded spaces and colons and all). Needless to
say, this doesn't get read-in by the rc-system. Admittedly, local_unbound is
one of only two rc-scripts in the base system that contain a desc fiels (at
least, in 10.1-RELEASE)
I've submitted a bug upstream, but in the mean time, the attached patch fixes
the problem for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list