[Bug 199820] [new port] www/rubygem-html-pipeline

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199820

--- Comment #7 from John Marino <marino at FreeBSD.org> ---
Hmm, it would be interesting to know about these 80:

1) are they there to support another port?  (if so, which?)
2) the general reason they were there to begin with

Yes, this information obviously changes things (bundle could go from 96 to 16)
but it also could be an opportunity to contract rubygems.  Remember there is a
sentiment to get rid of them, so if some portion of the 80 existing ports can
be moved to a new bundle port, it would probably be welcome.

Extra work, sure.  That's why I would be interested in knowing how each of
these 80 came to be (obviously rubygems used by another port are not eligible
for bundling)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.