[Bug 198581] dns/unbound: add aaaa-filter option from contrib patch within the source tarball
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Sat Mar 14 15:14:33 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198581
Bug ID: 198581
Summary: dns/unbound: add aaaa-filter option from contrib patch
within the source tarball
Product: Ports & Packages
Version: Latest
Hardware: Any
OS: Any
Status: New
Severity: Affects Only Me
Priority: ---
Component: Individual Port(s)
Assignee: sem at FreeBSD.org
Reporter: darksoul at darkbsd.org
Flags: maintainer-feedback?(sem at FreeBSD.org)
Assignee: sem at FreeBSD.org
Created attachment 154300
--> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154300&action=edit
Adds the AAAA_FILTER option to the config menu, along with patching from the
file contrib/aaaa-filter-iterator.patch which is in the unbound source
I have developed a patch recently to implement within unbound functionality
similar to BIND's "filter-aaaa" option.
This feature not being readily available is one major reason Japanese ISPs can
not leave BIND behind.
(Physical carriers such as NTT roll out their own in-house closed IPv6 routing,
over which ISPs have no control, if they don't themselves provide IPv6 service
to the customers)
It has been included in unbound's contrib/ starting with the latest version
(1.5.1), but was initially developped for version 1.4.17.
The patch applies properly on any version above so far, so I was thinking
adding a Makefile option, and a clause in the "post-patch:" section to apply
it.
I have included a proposal of Makefile, along with a diff explaining what
changes I have done.
I am willing to provide whatever help is required.
I was also wondering one thing, since the binaries generated will
ultimately be quite different, should the option alter the package name?
I have not done so, but I fear a miscalculated port update after tuning
repositories might have dramatic effects, so I thought one way to avoid
the headache would be to have a different package name.
Thanks in advance for your time,
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list