[Bug 196750] [PATCH] x11-themes/fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack: Update to 20100605

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=196750

lightside <lightside at gmx.com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
 Attachment #152080|0                           |1
        is obsolete|                            |

--- Comment #13 from lightside <lightside at gmx.com> ---
Created attachment 152082
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=152082&action=edit
New proposed patch (since 372709 revision)

(In reply to comment #11)
> This leads to the need of possible re-creation of such distfile, in case of new fluxbox version

Thinking about this, I moved determination of installed style directories to
pre-install stage. Now it looks like this:
===>  Staging for fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack-20100605
===>   fluxbox-tenr-styles-pack-20100605 depends on executable: fluxbox - found
===>  List of excluded style directories, installed by fluxbox:
BlueFlux Emerge arch bloe bora_black bora_blue bora_green carp
green_tea ostrich zimek_bisque zimek_darkblue zimek_green

The distfile contains all styles from http://tenr.de/styles/ site, but it
should be created and hosted somewhere to be used in ports. The nightly tarball
repackaged to ${DISTNAME}${EXTRACT_SUFX} and ${DISTNAME} for root directory of
archive is also good (or might be adapted), but it could have different
checksum, because of auto-generated nature of some files/directories, - the
create-distfile stage does it automatically, while retain the same checksum.

In case of new fluxbox version, the PORTREVISION of current port should be
bumped, then the ports/package system will determine the differences in styles
automatically.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.