[Bug 199343] sysutils/moosefs-chunkserver: Upgrade to 2.0.63-1
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org
Fri Apr 24 14:22:20 UTC 2015
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199343
Kubilay Kocak <koobs at FreeBSD.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |koobs at FreeBSD.org
Keywords| |needs-patch, needs-qa
Flags| |maintainer-feedback?(freebs
| |d at moosefs.com)
--- Comment #2 from Kubilay Kocak <koobs at FreeBSD.org> ---
On initial triage:
* Updates must be provided in unified diff format (svn diff) not as archives
* You'll want to run all of your patches/ports/PR's through:
1) portlint -AC (it can be found in ports-mgmt/portlint)
2) poudriere testport (or bulk -t) See:
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/testing-poudriere.html
* I think a MASTER/SLAVE port setup might be better for the moosefs-* ports
instead of including a Makefile.common. See:
http://www2.au.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#makefile-masterdir
* COMMENT should be a short description of the port, not just it's
functionality:
COMMENT= Managing the whole filesystem and storing metadata
Says nothing about MooseFS or the component that is included.
Something like the following may be better:
COMMENT= Moose File System: Master & Metadata Server
* The following look like workarounds for an issue elsewhere:
DISTNAME= ${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}-${PORTREVISION}
WRKSRC= ${WRKDIR}/${PORTNAME}-${PORTVERSION}
In particular PORTREVISION shouldn't be a part of DISTNAME.
See:
http://www2.au.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/book.html#makefile-distfiles
If you need assistance with any of this, we are available in #freebsd-ports on
freenode or #bsdports on efnet
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list