[Bug 193459] www/mod_security dependency on db48 shared library is missing

[bugzilla-noreply at freebsd.org]

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193459

matorola at gmail.com changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|Issue Resolved              |In Discussion
         Resolution|Works As Intended           |---

--- Comment #2 from matorola at gmail.com ---
Well, probably I wasn't specific, what I meant is that, removing db48 package
via "pkg remove db48" should warn that there's packages, which are still depend
on it, for example, ap22-mod_security (which is indeed has libdb-4.8.so.0 as
required):

[root at u163 14:51:01 /]# pkg info ap22-mod_security
ap22-mod_security-2.7.7_3
Name           : ap22-mod_security
Version        : 2.7.7_3
Installed on   : Tue Jun 24 16:32:50 MSK 2014
Origin         : www/mod_security
Architecture   : freebsd:10:x86:64
Prefix         : /usr/local
Categories     : www security
Licenses       : APACHE20
Maintainer     : walter at lifeforms.nl
WWW            : http://www.modsecurity.org/
Comment        : Intrusion detection and prevention engine
Options        :
        LUA            : off
        MLOGC          : off
Shared Libs required:
        libxml2.so.2
        libpcre.so.3
        libgdbm.so.4
        libexpat.so.6
        libdb-4.8.so.0
        libaprutil-1.so.0
        libapr-1.so.0

but currently, removing db48 does not have this warning:

[root at u163 14:52:02 /]# pkg remove db48
Checking integrity... done (0 conflicting)
Deinstallation has been requested for the following 1 packages (of 0 packages
in the universe):

Installed packages to be REMOVED:
        db48-4.8.30.0_2

The operation will free 12 MB.

Proceed with deinstalling packages? [y/N]:

PS: taking it to the apr side, apr has libdb-5.3.so.0 in the requirements,
which is provided by db5 (db5-5.3.28_1) package.

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.