ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate
René Ladan
rene at freebsd.org
Mon May 5 19:50:02 UTC 2014
The following reply was made to PR ports/188127; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: =?UTF-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9_Ladan?= <rene at freebsd.org>
To: C Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com>
Cc: "mailto:bug-followup at FreeBSD.org," <bug-followup at freebsd.org>, rm at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/188127: net/wackamole : deprecate
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 21:41:25 +0200
--089e0115f84220f0cf04f8ac51c0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2014-05-05 21:15 GMT+02:00 C Hutchinson <portmaster at bsdforge.com>:
> > Feel free to have this port resurrected once net/spread is fixed
> > (fetchable, staged). Note that the maintainer did not reply to this PR
> > at all.
> >
> > Ren=C3=A9
> >
> Hello, Ren=C3=A9, and thank you for your reply.
>
> I think I'm a bit confused. My motivation for addressing ports/188853
> (net/spread) was to prevent some 12 ports from being deleted, as they
> all depended on net/spread. So I added a new reliable MASTER_SITES,
> and provided STAGE support, and submitted it as ports/188853.
Ah, Ruslan (CC'd) has this ticket in his TODO list.
> Some
> 2 weeks ago. So as you can see, the patch (diff) I submitted, fixed
> net/spread 2 weeks ago. But somebody with a commit bit needs to
> commit it. Are only people with commit bit's allowed to make patches?
>
No, anyone can submit patches but only people with a commit bit can commit
them into the repositories.
> Apologies. But I just don't understand why all these ports can't be
> saved, since I've already created a patch(1).
>
> They can always be restored from the Subversion repository :)
Regards,
Ren=C3=A9
--089e0115f84220f0cf04f8ac51c0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<div dir=3D"ltr"><div class=3D"gmail_extra"><div class=3D"gmail_quote">2014=
-05-05 21:15 GMT+02:00 C Hutchinson <span dir=3D"ltr"><<a href=3D"mailto=
:portmaster at bsdforge.com" target=3D"_blank">portmaster at bsdforge.com</a>>=
</span>:<br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5">>=
Feel free to have this port resurrected once net/spread is fixed<br>
> (fetchable, staged). =C2=A0Note that the maintainer did not reply to t=
his PR<br>
> at all.<br>
><br>
> Ren=C3=A9<br>
><br>
</div></div>Hello, Ren=C3=A9, and thank you for your reply.<br></blockquote=
><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .=
8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I think I'm a bit confused. My motivation for addressing ports/188853<b=
r>
(net/spread) was to prevent some 12 ports from being deleted, as they<br>
all depended on net/spread. So I added a new reliable MASTER_SITES,<br>
and provided STAGE support, and submitted it as ports/188853.</blockquote><=
div><br></div><div>Ah, Ruslan (CC'd) has this ticket in his TODO list.<=
/div><div>=C2=A0</div><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0=
0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Some<br>
2 weeks ago. So as you can see, the patch (diff) I submitted, fixed<br>
net/spread 2 weeks ago. But somebody with a commit bit needs to<br>
commit it. Are only people with commit bit's allowed to make patches?<b=
r></blockquote><div>No, anyone can submit patches but only people with a co=
mmit bit can commit them into the repositories.</div><div>=C2=A0</div><bloc=
kquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #cc=
c solid;padding-left:1ex">
Apologies. But I just don't understand why all these ports can't be=
<br>
saved, since I've already created a patch(1).<br>
<br></blockquote><div>They can always be restored from the Subversion repos=
itory :)</div><div>=C2=A0</div></div>Regards,<br>Ren=C3=A9</div><div class=
=3D"gmail_extra"><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>
</div></div>
--089e0115f84220f0cf04f8ac51c0--
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list