ports/169043: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile

Samuel Martin Moro faust64 at gmail.com
Sat Jun 16 21:40:12 UTC 2012


The following reply was made to PR ports/169043; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Samuel Martin Moro <faust64 at gmail.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Cc: Edwin Groothuis <edwin at FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/169043: Add CONFLICTS_INSTALL=fusefs-ntfs to sysutils/ntfsprogs/Makefile
Date: Sat, 16 Jun 2012 23:34:08 +0200

 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
 --------------060902080202080108050604
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 On 06/14/2012 02:13 AM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
 > Maintainer of sysutils/ntfsprogs,
 >
 > Please note that PR ports/169043 has just been submitted.
 >
 > If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix
 > you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch
 > and a committer will take care of it.
 >
 > The full text of the PR can be found at:
 >      http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/169043
 >
 >    
 Hi,
 
 Indeed, I'm aware of that problem.
 Thanks for your patch!
 
 Still, since every lib and "interesting stuff" (ntfs resize, format, 
 ....) have now been sucked up into fuse-ntfs port, I'm not sure how to 
 proceed, but wouldn't it be wiser to remove ntfsprogs from ports tree?
 
 Do you know who should I contact about this?
 Maybe a thread on questions@?
 
 
 Thanks,
 
 Regards.
 
 --------------060902080202080108050604
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
 <html>
 <head>
   <meta content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1"
  http-equiv="Content-Type">
 </head>
 <body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
 On 06/14/2012 02:13 AM, Edwin Groothuis wrote:
 <blockquote cite="mid:20120614001333.F10021065686 at hub.freebsd.org"
  type="cite">
   <pre wrap="">Maintainer of sysutils/ntfsprogs,
 
 Please note that PR ports/169043 has just been submitted.
 
 If it contains a patch for an upgrade, an enhancement or a bug fix
 you agree on, reply to this email stating that you approve the patch
 and a committer will take care of it.
 
 The full text of the PR can be found at:
     <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/169043">http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/169043</a>
 
   </pre>
 </blockquote>
 <small><font face="FreeMono">Hi,<br>
 <br>
 Indeed, I'm aware of that problem.<br>
 Thanks for your patch!<br>
 <br>
 Still, since every lib and "interesting stuff" (ntfs resize, format,
 ....) have now been sucked up into fuse-ntfs port, I'm not sure how to
 proceed, but wouldn't it be wiser to remove ntfsprogs from ports tree?<br>
 <br>
 Do you know who should I contact about this?<br>
 Maybe a thread on questions@?<br>
 <br>
 <br>
 Thanks,<br>
 <br>
 Regards.</font></small><br>
 </body>
 </html>
 
 --------------060902080202080108050604--



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list