ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm
Jan Henrik Sylvester
me at janh.de
Fri Jan 13 00:00:33 UTC 2012
The following reply was made to PR ports/164029; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Jan Henrik Sylvester <me at janh.de>
To: Rob Farmer <rfarmer at predatorlabs.net>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/164029: [PATCH] graphics/bmeps fix build with databases/gdbm
Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 00:35:39 +0100
On 01/13/2012 00:07, Rob Farmer wrote:
> But, the build doesn't actually fail because we only build bmeps,
> which shouldn't need databases or snmp. Can you ignore the message and
> continue, or does it completely fail?
What do you mean with "the build doesn't actually fail"?
fails (on 9.0-RELEASE/amd64 with current ports tree and databases/gdbm
installed) with the error message you got, too, and additionally this:
===> Script "configure" failed unexpectedly.
Please report the problem to rfarmer at predatorlabs.net [maintainer] and
the "/usr/ports/graphics/bmeps/work/dktools-2.2.22/config.log" including the
output of the failure of your make command. Also, it might be a good idea to
provide an overview of all packages installed on your system (e.g. an `ls
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/ports/graphics/bmeps.
I do not know how to ignore this. Tools dealing with ports consider this
a build failure.
Yes, I can got to work/dktools-2.2.22/ and run make successfully, but
this is not how ports are supposed to be used.
Since you say that bmeps does not actually use databases, my patch will
do not harm, but fix the build (of the port).
Have I misunderstood you?
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs