ports/160820: maintainer update: mail/dovecot2 and dovecot2-pigeonhole

Attila Nagy bra at fsn.hu
Mon Sep 19 09:10:09 UTC 2011


The following reply was made to PR ports/160820; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Attila Nagy <bra at fsn.hu>
To: Jase Thew <freebsd at beardz.net>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/160820: maintainer update: mail/dovecot2 and dovecot2-pigeonhole
Date: Mon, 19 Sep 2011 10:43:50 +0200

 This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
 --------------080107040102030007040908
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 Hi,
 
 OK, thanks.
 
 On 09/19/11 10:34, Jase Thew wrote:
 > Hi,
 >
 > The reason for the patch in 
 > dovecot2-pigeonhole/files/patch-doc_Makefile_in hasn't suddenly gone 
 > away with v0.2.4. Without a regenerated version of this patch to apply 
 > to v0.2.4, there will be left-over files :
 >
 > === Checking filesystem state
 > list of extra files and directories in / (not present before this port 
 > was installed but present after it was deinstalled)
 > 3357455        3 drwxr-xr-x    2 root             wheel   4 Sep 19 
 > 08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve
 > 3357456       10 -r--r--r--    1 root             wheel 4173 Sep 19 
 > 08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve/vacation.txt
 > 3357457       11 -r--r--r--    1 root             wheel 5016 Sep 19 
 > 08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve/spamtest-virustest.txt
 >
 > Please refer to ports/158173 for an explanation of why this doc patch 
 > is necessary.
 >
 > Can you also please keep in mind, just because a patch no longer 
 > applies cleanly, this doesn't mean that the patch (or more 
 > specifically, the issue that it addresses) is no longer relevant.
 >
 > I strongly recommend that you test future PR patches with either a 
 > tinderbox or ports-mgmt/porttools e.g., so that you can identify 
 > issues such as this (left-over files) and have the opportunity to fix 
 > them before submitting a PR.
 >
 > I've attached a regenerated 
 > dovecot2-pigeonhole/files/patch-doc_Makefile_in so that the port won't 
 > have any left-over files.
 >
 > Regards,
 >
 > Jase.
 >
 > -- 
 >
 > [1] http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158173#reply4
 
 
 --------------080107040102030007040908
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 
 <html>
   <head>
 
     <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">
   </head>
   <body bgcolor="#FFFFFF" text="#000000">
     Hi,<br>
     <br>
     OK, thanks.<br>
     <br>
     On 09/19/11 10:34, Jase Thew wrote:
     <blockquote class=" cite" id="mid_4E76FE9D_6070201_beardz_net"
       cite="mid:4E76FE9D.6070201 at beardz.net" type="cite">Hi,
       <br>
       <br>
       The reason for the patch in
       dovecot2-pigeonhole/files/patch-doc_Makefile_in hasn't suddenly
       gone away with v0.2.4. Without a regenerated version of this patch
       to apply to v0.2.4, there will be left-over files :
       <br>
       <br>
       === Checking filesystem state
       <br>
       list of extra files and directories in / (not present before this
       port was installed but present after it was deinstalled)
       <br>
       3357455        3 drwxr-xr-x    2 root             wheel   4 Sep 19
       08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve
       <br>
       3357456       10 -r--r--r--    1 root             wheel 4173 Sep
       19 08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve/vacation.txt
       <br>
       3357457       11 -r--r--r--    1 root             wheel 5016 Sep
       19 08:08 usr/local/share/doc/dovecot/sieve/spamtest-virustest.txt
       <br>
       <br>
       Please refer to ports/158173 for an explanation of why this doc
       patch is necessary.
       <br>
       <br>
       Can you also please keep in mind, just because a patch no longer
       applies cleanly, this doesn't mean that the patch (or more
       specifically, the issue that it addresses) is no longer relevant.
       <br>
       <br>
       I strongly recommend that you test future PR patches with either a
       tinderbox or ports-mgmt/porttools e.g., so that you can identify
       issues such as this (left-over files) and have the opportunity to
       fix them before submitting a PR.
       <br>
       <br>
       I've attached a regenerated
       dovecot2-pigeonhole/files/patch-doc_Makefile_in so that the port
       won't have any left-over files.
       <br>
       <br>
       Regards,
       <br>
       <br>
       Jase.
       <br>
       <br>
       --
       <br>
       <br>
       [1] <a class="moz-txt-link-freetext" href="http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158173#reply4">http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/158173#reply4</a>
       <br>
     </blockquote>
     <br>
   </body>
 </html>
 
 --------------080107040102030007040908--



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list