ports/161225: security/pam_fprint: Updates to the last git version

Michael Scheidell scheidell at freebsd.org
Mon Nov 28 12:01:52 UTC 2011


maybe mark BROKEN, not IGNORE?

can I include   BROKEN in pam_fprint and fprint_demo if osversin < 800069?

On 11/28/11 6:43 AM, Zhihao Yuan wrote:
>
> The problem has been discussed here 
> www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224 
> <http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/161224>
>
> The thing is, we need libusb-1.0, what you referred in ports is 0.1x
>
I guess I am confused somewhat.  its got me running in circles.

libfprint only needs libusb on fbsd 7.x, right?
.if ${OSVERSION} < 800069
IGNORE=         libusb-1.0 is not avaible on FreeBSD < 8
.else
CONFIGURE_ENV+= LIBUSB_CFLAGS=" " LIBUSB_LIBS="-lusb"
.endif


but in libusb, I see:
.if ${OSVERSION} >= 800069
IGNORE=         has been already included into base system
.endif


should not the logic be, osversion < 80069 to include as a dependency 
libusb?

or do we mark libfprint, and the two fprint programs BROKEN if osversion 
< 800069?


-- 
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
 >*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation

    * Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
    * Best Intrusion Prevention Product
    * Hot Company Finalist 2011
    * Best Email Security Product
    * Certified SNORT Integrator




More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list