ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd
neeraj verma
numberformat at gmail.com
Wed May 18 01:20:12 UTC 2011
The following reply was made to PR ports/151467; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: neeraj verma <numberformat at gmail.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, neeraj.verma.ports at vermatech.com
Cc:
Subject: Re: ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:50 -0400
--000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments:
1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened.
2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of
an IF ELSE statement.
3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can
you please elaborate?
4. I have fixed this.
5. I have fixed this.
6. I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming scheme.
He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION value to be
non standard. Is that OK?
Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files.
--000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments:<br><br>1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened.<br>2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of an IF ELSE statement.<br>
3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can you please elaborate?<br>4. I have fixed this.<br>5. I have fixed this.<br>6.
I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming
scheme. He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION
value to be non standard. Is that OK?<br><br>Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files.<br>
--000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5--
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list