ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd

neeraj verma numberformat at gmail.com
Wed May 18 01:20:12 UTC 2011


The following reply was made to PR ports/151467; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: neeraj verma <numberformat at gmail.com>
To: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org, neeraj.verma.ports at vermatech.com
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/151467: New port: sysutils/autojump acts as a complement to cd
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 20:41:50 -0400

 --000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments:
 
 1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened.
 2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of
 an IF ELSE statement.
 3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can
 you please elaborate?
 4. I have fixed this.
 5. I have fixed this.
 6. I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming scheme.
 He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION value to be
 non standard. Is that OK?
 
 Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files.
 
 --000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5
 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
 
 Thanks for looking at my submission. Here are my comments:<br><br>1. I have fixed this. The comment line has been shortened.<br>2. the duplicated RUN_DEPENDS line is not actually duplicated. It is part of an IF ELSE statement.<br>
 
 3. I am not understanding what the reinvent of "NO_BUILD" macro means. Can you please elaborate?<br>4. I have fixed this.<br>5. I have fixed this.<br>6.
  I spoke to the author about fixing his version and package naming 
 scheme. He said he will not change it so I had to change my PORTVERSION 
 value to be non standard. Is that OK?<br><br>Let me know your thoughts and I will post the modified files.<br>
 
 --000e0cd761d27acd8904a38227b5--



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list