ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64

Gerald Pfeifer gerald at pfeifer.com
Sun Feb 6 14:40:11 UTC 2011


The following reply was made to PR ports/151747; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Gerald Pfeifer <gerald at pfeifer.com>
To: David Naylor <naylor.b.david at gmail.com>
Cc: bug-followup at freebsd.org, kenorb at gmail.com
Subject: Re: ports/151747: request to enable emulators/wine on amd64
Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2011 15:31:14 +0100 (CET)

 On Mon, 31 Jan 2011, David Naylor wrote:
 >> Shouldn't USE_LDCONFIG32 use WINELIBDIR instead of repeating the
 >> stuff?
 > Agreed.
 
 Looking into the patch, I believe we can avoid the introduction of
 WINE_SLAVE_BUILD by making this
 
   .if !defined(USE_LDCONFIG32)
    USE_LDCONFIG=	${WINELIBDIR} ${WINELIBDIR}/wine
   .endif
 
 and will give it a try.
 
 Also, do we really need the CONFLICTS?  emulators/wine is
 ONLY_FOR_ARCHS=i386, whereas your port is for AMD64 only.
 
 >> post-install-wine: is really brutal; I'd hope FreeBSD will gain
 >> proper combined 32-/64-bit support at one point.
 > Agreed but I do not think there is sufficient demand to warrant the 
 > effort.  I suspect an approach similar to this one will suffice for
 > the few ports that are required to run under amd64.
 
 As time goes by, 32-bit support in a 64-bit OS becomes less important.
 It has been hugely important for customer in $DAYJOB, and I would not
 underestimate the amount of 32-bit legacy applications out there.
 
 Gerald



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list