ports/152045: New port: www/links-hacked browser with tricks for tabs, basic auth, better fonts and many more features

Peter Vereshagin peter at vereshagin.org
Mon Nov 8 10:20:05 UTC 2010


>Number:         152045
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       New port: www/links-hacked browser with tricks for tabs, basic auth, better fonts and many more features
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          sw-bug
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Nov 08 10:20:04 UTC 2010
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Peter Vereshagin
>Release:        RELENG_7 as of September, 2010
>Organization:
Private
>Environment:
FreeBSD screwed.box 7.3-STABLE FreeBSD 7.3-STABLE #2: Tue Oct  5 12:42:04 MSD 2010     toor at screwed.box:/usr/local/obj/usr/local/src/sys/JUICY  i386
>Description:
Renders faster than WebKit and has no console artefacts with X interface.
Not a rich-content stuff but most convinient to read HTML docs for free software, including very big files of s 'Single HTML' version, e. g., MySQL manual ;-)
Some obvious but sadly absurdly absent features from mainstream links-2 make this stuff absolutely essential. Those are: tabs with a state on a caption, 'copy link location' and many more.

Some portlint warnings are in:
===
WARN: Makefile: [74]: possible direct use of command "false" found. use ${FALSE} instead.
WARN: Makefile: unless this is a master port, MAINTAINER has to be set by "=", not by "?=".
===
both are present in www/links,  too, and:
===
WARN: Makefile: only one MASTER_SITE configured.  Consider adding additional mirrors.
===
but it's true that at the moment there is only one master site for the source defined. Somewhat different is at maemo repository, too.
===
WARN: Makefile: no need to define EXTRACT_SUFX if DISTFILES is defined.
===
but DISTFILES are defined through the EXTRACT_SUFX which itself is subject to change because 'tgz' is less appropriate for the source tarball than 'tar.gz'

oh, and... shall I be listed at: 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/articles/contributors/contrib-additional.html
?
>How-To-Repeat:

>Fix:


>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list