ports/147829: Improved net/ucarp startup script: multiple VHID and FIB support

[Alexey V. Degtyarev]

The following reply was made to PR ports/147829; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Alexey V. Degtyarev" <alexey at renatasystems.org>
To: Stefan Walter <stefan at freebsd.org>
Cc: Olivier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Cochard-Labb=E9?= <olivier at cochard.me>,
  GNATS <FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: ports/147829: Improved net/ucarp startup script: multiple VHID
 and FIB support
Date: Fri, 9 Jul 2010 18:00:38 +0400

 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Stefan, Oliver,
 
 On 13:53 Sat 03 Jul, Stefan Walter wrote:
 
 > > On 13:59 Thu 01 Jul, Stefan Walter wrote:
 > >=20
 > > > a problem report has been submitted for your port for which your
 > > > feedback might be required; its contents can be found at [1]. If
 > > > it contains a patch or suggestions for a change, please send a
 > > > followup to the PR explaining whether or not you approve it and
 > > > want it to be committed.
 > > >
 > > > [1]: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/147829
 > >=20
 > > Recently I just thought about implementing a support for multiple
 > > VHIDs with UCARP. I'll try to find a way to do it with "profiles"
 > > like it in www/apache22 or www/nginx rc-scripts done. Would it be
 > > acceptable for you?
 >=20
 > I don't know - I don't use this port. ;-) I merely wanted to draw your
 > attention to this PR. It was Olivier who sent the proposal. Since
 > you're the maintainer of the port, it's up to you how to handle this.
 > I would encourage you two to find a way acceptable for both, though,
 > since you both seem to be interested in this port.
 >=20
 > In case something should be committed, please send a followup to this
 > PR so a committer can pick it up.
 
 well, I was confused because have never received pr-followup of "waiting
 for maintainer to approve" from a real, alive person. So I thought you are
 interested somehow it that particular pr/functionality.
 
 As for that pr, it is blocked by ports/148012 maintainer-update which is
 still waiting for commit (just for Oliver's info).
 
 Best regards,
 --=20
 Alexey V. Degtyarev
 
 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (FreeBSD)
 
 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJMNyuGAAoJEBltwwVHB+frwNEH/RrsOrlPwFkbucq8c4DfBJij
 SGTWTPjaj2O1Ih5/5yvzNk4k6yIQfl5S7pdz8+oBs4wKLek1qmBv/nQOTGJVVvrm
 rY8/eO30bd8Z71P3PKMYpofnYPu103iyk5DtKkq+6Kz8OW5U2Nm2p/58WfKZg8mC
 xK0fZn+CxlaAzE7mdU6Z0Vg2fuR53Yv29GvxURNj8GoqPwP2mTGDW8sw7vw2UKVt
 nso23pfY6I+Xu99h5bG7qS3iR7X3k/VHBjrYYyyqao2RmDfm9k1GVO1Dyr6orCU4
 scRl7m1XX0pZzMy+emgUFWjRpQlbnf4t2ynMIx9MPccAKnQHMf19jL6oLiAeKo4=
 =Wnz9
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --WIyZ46R2i8wDzkSu--