ports/132035: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT

[Robert Noland]

On Thu, 2009-02-26 at 13:28 +0300, Anonymous wrote:
> Robert Noland <rnoland at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> 
> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 06:31 +0300, Anonymous wrote:
> >> Robert Noland <rnoland at FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >> 
> >> > On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 01:00 +0000, edwin at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> >> >> Synopsis: [patch] graphics/libdrm: allow slave ports use their own COMMENT
> >> >> 
> >> >> Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-x11
> >> >> Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
> >> >> Responsible-Changed-When: Tue Feb 24 01:00:20 UTC 2009
> >> >> Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> >> >> Over to maintainer (via the GNATS Auto Assign Tool)
> >> >
> >> > Why do you want a slave port?  That is just going to complicate things.
> >> 
> >> Things are already complicated enough that distfile for libdrm-2.4.5
> >> doesn't include
> >> 
> >>     libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_dma.h
> >>     libdrm/nouveau/nouveau_private.h
> >> 
> >> As airlied explained on #dri-devel I guess it was itentional to force
> >> users to only use version from git.
> >> 
> >> > I don't see any reason not to install the various libdrm interfaces
> >> > right now.
> >> 
> >> As I understand nouveau interface is not stable. It may go away to a
> >> separate branch one day. If that happens I would not need to touch
> >> libdrm port, only convert libdrm-nouveau from slave port to a normal one
> >> with snapshot as distfile and switch xf86-video-nouveau to statically
> >> link with libdrm_nouveau.a.
> >
> > Lets wait and deal with it when that time comes... I will at least have
> > a say in what happens there.  Once we have something resembling working
> > nouveau drm code it may become more relevant, but I don't want to go
> > down this path right now if we don't have to.
> 
> Looks like I misunderstood. Those files are now part of distfile
> generating target. So, I don't mind dropping slave port idea.
> 
> How about attached patch? Now that libdrm port was updated to 2.4.5
> xf86-video-nouveau is broken. It needs an update, too.

This looks ok, but let me see whats going on with the nouveau folk.
Maybe we can just cut a point release since this is fixed in git
already.

robert.

-- 
Robert Noland <rnoland at FreeBSD.org>
FreeBSD
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20090226/74371a66/attachment.sig>