ports/124157: Repocopy request: print/ghostscript-*

[Hiroki Sato]

>Number:         124157
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Repocopy request: print/ghostscript-*
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat May 31 08:50:04 UTC 2008
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Hiroki Sato
>Release:        FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE i386
>Organization:
Tokyo University of Science
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD alph.allbsd.org 7.0-STABLE FreeBSD 7.0-STABLE #1: Sun May  4 19:04:06 JST 2008 hrs at alph.allbsd.org:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ALPH  i386


>Description:

	Since Ghostscript is now GPL'd and the other variants are no
	longer maintained, the current package names corresponding to
	them can make the users confused.  So, I think we need to
	change the port/package names to more straightforward ones.
	Specifically, my suggestion is the following:

	print/ghostscript-gnu -> print/ghostscript7
	print/ghostscript-gnu-nox11 -> print/ghostscript7-nox11
	print/ghostscript-gnu-commfont -> print/ghostscript7-commfont
	print/ghostscript-gpl -> print/ghostscript8
	print/ghostscript-gpl-nox11 -> print/ghostscript8-nox11
	japanese/ghostscript-gnu-jpnfont -> print/ghostscript7-jpnfont
	korean/ghostscript-gnu-korfont -> print/ghostscript7-korfont

	Portmgr, please handle the above repo-copy.  I will handle the
	remaining changes such as dependency fix.

	The reason why the last two entries should be in print
	category instead of {japanese,korean} category is that
	Ghostscript itself is not language-dependent.

>How-To-Repeat:
	N/A

>Fix:
	N/A
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: