ports/124770: [NEW PORT] www/jericho-html: A java library to analyse and manipulate HTML

Marcin Cieslak saper at SYSTEM.PL
Sun Jun 22 11:26:50 UTC 2008


miwi at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/jericho-html: A java library to analyse and manipulate HTML
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
> State-Changed-By: miwi
> State-Changed-When: Fri Jun 20 15:16:52 UTC 2008
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Hi
> 
> Here the patch is rejected. Could you please send me a tarball as attachment?
> 
> https://tinderbox.chruetertee.ch/index.php?action=describe_port&id=2534

Attached is the full tarball.

Yes, the problem is that the patch (albeit only cosmetic one) contains 
binary characters badly treated by shar.

Should I uuencode it? What is the best practice for this case?


-- 
               << Marcin Cieslak // saper at system.pl >>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 273 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20080622/852d6bb0/attachment.sig>


More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list