ports/119734: Latest release of ksh93

[Joe Kelsey]

>Number:         119734
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Latest release of ksh93
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       critical
>Priority:       high
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          maintainer-update
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Thu Jan 17 00:00:04 UTC 2008
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Joe Kelsey
>Release:        FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE amd64
>Organization:
Joseph M. Kelsey
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us 6.2-STABLE FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE #3: Wed May 23 20:02:37 PDT 2007 root at zircon.zircon.seattle.wa.us:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/ZIRCON amd64

>Description:
	Update to 2007-11-05 release
>How-To-Repeat:
	Install latest code.

	Every time I submit a new release change, I also attempt to
	remove all existing restrictions on the port.  This really means
	the sparc64 restriction.  I do not have a sparc64 to test with,
	so my only hope is to remove the port restriction and see what
	happens with the build.  Glenn fowler builds on sparc64 and
	releases a binary for the platform.  Why cannot the FreeBSD team
	do the same?

>Fix:

--- Makefile.old	Mon Jul  9 17:18:35 2007
+++ Makefile	Wed Jan 16 15:19:58 2008
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
 
 MANUAL_PACKAGE_BUILD=Doesn't build in tinderbox environment
 
-VERSION=	2007-06-28
+VERSION=	2007-11-05
 RESTRICTED=	Source recipient must acknowledge license
 
 FETCH_ENV=	HTTP_AUTH='basic:*:I accept www.opensource.org/licenses/cpl:.'
@@ -44,10 +44,6 @@
 .include <bsd.port.pre.mk>
 
 INSTALLROOT=	${WRKSRC}/arch/freebsd${OSREL:R}.${ARCH}
-
-.if ${ARCH} == "sparc64"
-BROKEN=	Does not compile on sparc64
-.endif
 
 do-build:
 	@cd ${WRKSRC} && ${SETENV} -i ${MAKE_ENV} ${SH} bin/package make
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: