ports/117253: graphics/xfig and xfig-devel no longer find ghostscript fonts.

Edwin Groothuis edwin at mavetju.org
Thu Oct 18 21:45:57 UTC 2007


On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:08:32AM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
> Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 04:25:46PM -0700, Steven G. Kargl wrote:
> > > edwin at FreeBSD.org wrote:
> > > > Old Synopsis: xfig and xfig-devel no longer find ghostscript fonts.
> > > > New Synopsis: graphics/xfig and xfig-devel no longer find ghostscript fonts.
> > > 
> > > Grrr.  By changing the subject/synopsis, you've redirected my
> > > email with patches attached to the bit bucket. 
> > 
> > http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/porters-handbook/porting-submitting.html
> > 
> 
> Yeah, ah, thanks.
> 
> Now, as I said, I can no longer send emails to be archived with the
> PR.  So,  here's the missing patches.  Do with them what you want.

I don't really understand why you think your emails aren't archived
anymore.

It could be that you are confused with the the email addresses in
the automatic replies from GNATS: freebsd-ports-bugs at FreeBSD.org
is just a mailinglist, while freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org and
bug-followup at freebsd.org are interfaces to GNATS. As long as the
category/pr-number is in the subject all discussions send to the
last two addresses are archived.

I have bounced your email with the patches to the GNATS system and
it was recorded, even while the synopsis had changed.

Edwin
-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin at mavetju.org    |              Weblog: http://www.mavetju.org/weblog/



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list