ports/97488: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4

[Edwin Groothuis]

On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 02:59:39PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Fri, 19 May 2006 20:23:25 +1000 Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > On Fri, May 19, 2006 at 01:25:25PM +0400, Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > > On Fri, 19 May 2006 09:10:55 GMT Edwin Groothuis wrote:
> > > 
> > > > Synopsis: [repocopy] from linux_base-fc3 to linux_base-fc4
> > > 
> > > > Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-ports-bugs->freebsd-emulation
> > > > Responsible-Changed-By: edwin
> > > > Responsible-Changed-When: Fri May 19 09:10:54 UTC 2006
> > > > Responsible-Changed-Why: 
> > > > Over to maintainer
> > > 
> > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=97488
> > > 
> > > Shouldn't it be assigned to portmgr@?:
> 
> > If the maintainer approves of it.
> 
> Thanks for your answer, but some questions are left.
> 
> I'm not sure who is treated as a maintainer. Isn't it netchild, who
> filed this PR? Or am I not understanding the procedure? Is it needed
> to be approved from the email address freebsd-emulation@?

The ports Makefile says: the maintainers email address is
freebsd-emulation at FreeBSD.org. Big problem here, that's not a real
person. But how can a script know this?

If I assign it to portmgr for a repocopy, I'll get the PR back in
my lap when the repocopy is done, not netchild at . In the mean time
(and sorry for the noise), netchild is old and wise enough to know
how to assign this PR back to himself :-)

Edwin
-- 
Edwin Groothuis      |            Personal website: http://www.mavetju.org
edwin at mavetju.org    |          Weblog: http://weblog.barnet.com.au/edwin/