ports/95708: freebsd startup script for sec port

[Ion-Mihai IOnut Tetcu]

On Fri, 14 Jul 2006 21:07:05 -0700
Jo Rhett <jrhett at svcolo.com> wrote:

> > On 04/05/2006, Jo Rhett wrote:
> > > I'm highly amused that I would be asked to make some changes, when
> > > the request for said changes requires more typing than making the
> > > changes.  This is what, 41 characters different?
>  
> On Thu, May 04, 2006 at 08:43:15PM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > Some maintainers object, vociferously, to any change made to their ports
> > without their approval.  Therefore, the default policy is that maintainers
> > need to be asked, because it is too difficult to remember which maintainers
> > will complain and which won't.  This is a classical case of "damned if you
> > do, damned if you don't."
> 
> I'm not certain we're talking about the same thing.
> 
> Bouncing a patch back to me for a 12-character replacement seemed silly.

[I don't know the case in question here.]

In addition, in general, bouncing back a change to the maintainer is also a learning
experience that, hopefully, will teach them not to make the same
mistake next time. You'd amazed how much we have to deal with same
mistakes over and over again.


-- 
IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
  "Intellectual Property" is   nowhere near as valuable   as "Intellect"

BOFH excuse #168:
le0: no carrier: transceiver cable problem?


-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20060715/cf21b23e/attachment.sig>