ports/102602: repocopy devel/sge -> devel/sdl_sge

[Jona Joachim]

>Number:         102602
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       repocopy devel/sge -> devel/sdl_sge
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Aug 28 11:50:16 GMT 2006
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Jona Joachim
>Release:        FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE i386
>Organization:
none
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD nirvana.lan.net 6.1-STABLE FreeBSD 6.1-STABLE #0: Fri Jul 21 18:52:28 CEST 2006 default at nirvana.lan.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/HYPOCENTER i386
ries (multiple lines)>
>Description:
When I initially posted this port (ports/101364) I called it devel/SGE in upper case so
that there is no ambiguity concerning sysutils/sge. Vanilla I. Shu decided to rename the
port to devel/sge in an effort to keep all port names in lower case. I think this is the
only case in the ports tree where two ports share the same name. Some tools don't handle
this correctly. Portaudit for example doesn't let you build SGE because of a root exploit
(http://www.freebsd.org/ports/portaudit/57a0242d-8c4e-11da-8ddf-000ae42e9b93.html) in the
Sun Grid Engine (sysutils/sge), which is in no way related to the SDL Graphics Extension
(devel/sge). Vanilla told me the problem resides in security/vuxml. I don't know how far
other tools (portupgrade?) are concerned. I propose to rename the port to devel/sdl_sge in
analogy to graphics/sdl_gfx to get rid of this problem.

Best regards,
Jona
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: