ports/86098: [PATCH] devel/pear-PEAR/Makefile.common: allow use by foreign packages

[Roman Neuhauser]

The following reply was made to PR ports/86098; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Roman Neuhauser <neuhauser at sigpipe.cz>
To: Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/86098: [PATCH] devel/pear-PEAR/Makefile.common: allow use by foreign packages
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2005 22:06:58 +0200

 # pav at FreeBSD.org / 2005-09-14 21:46:33 +0200:
 > Roman Neuhauser pise v st 14. 09. 2005 v 21:42 +0200:
 > > # pav at FreeBSD.org / 2005-09-14 21:35:51 +0200:
 > > > Roman Neuhauser pí¹e v st 14. 09. 2005 v 21:19 +0200:
 > > > > and the DIST_SUBDIR doesn't look right either.
 > > > 
 > > > Looks ok if we say all pear things will go there (ie. non-pear.php.org
 > > > ones too).
 > > 
 > >     Isn't that cyclic reasoning? IOW, that's exactly the point: should
 > >     we say that?
 > 
 > We should, IMHO.
  
     Ok, but you should also say why.
 
 > OT: Same should have been done for p5 ports long time ago.
 
     Should we also have DIST_SUBDIR=C for programs written in C? :)
 
 > Just observe the mess in your /usr/ports/distfiles now :)
 
     roman at isis ~ 1009:0 > du -hs /usr/ports/distfiles
     1.1G    /usr/ports/distfiles
     roman at isis ~ 1010:0 > ls /usr/ports/distfiles/**/*(.) | wc -l
         1071
     roman at isis ~ 1011:0 > ls -d1 /var/db/pkg/p5-* | wc -l
           13
 
 -- 
 How many Vietnam vets does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 You don't know, man.  You don't KNOW.
 Cause you weren't THERE.             http://bash.org/?255991