ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums
Pav Lucistnik
pav at FreeBSD.org
Wed Nov 23 17:01:23 UTC 2005
The following reply was made to PR ports/89415; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org>
To: vd at datamax.bg
Cc: bug-followup at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/89415: add some SHA256 sums
Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 17:51:58 +0100
--=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Vasil Dimov p=ED=B9e v st 23. 11. 2005 v 18:48 +0200:
> On Wed, Nov 23, 2005 at 05:10:33PM +0100, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > How does this cope with the maintainer approvals? Lot of those ports ar=
e
> > owned by someone. I don't think there's a general clearance to bypass
> > maintainers on this change.
> >=20
>=20
> Well, I filled this PR, thinking that no explicit maintainers' approval
> is needed for this change. This my thought is based on the relevant
> "SHA256 checksums" discussion on ports@ and on your unambiguous request:
>=20
> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2005-November/027258.htm=
l :
>=20
> --- cut ---
> > A diff from my ports dir can be found at:
> > http://vdev.datamax.bg/tmp/ports_sha256.diff.gz
> > (655 distfiles available)
>=20
> Please send-pr it, otherwise it will almost certainly get lost.
I was somehow under impression that the patch touched only yours and
unmaintained ports.
> I think asking portmgr for approval is the best choise for this PR.
Probably.
> Otherwise the diff must be split into small diffs for each maintainer's
> ports and somehow (flood the PR database with 600+ PRs?) ask for approval=
.
> This sounds really horrible and thoughtless.
Awwww.
> Other solution is to leave the things as they are and use the widespread
> "do nothing" strategy :-) After all there are more important things to
> bother with, than the SHA256 sums.
Sounds best.
Also, could your tool be tailored to insert the lines to distinfo where
'make makesum' would insert them, not on the end?
--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
<pav at FreeBSD.org>
Nazgul have poisoned your lembas.
--=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)
iD8DBQBDhJ4untdYP8FOsoIRAu8tAKCbZFpgjWsJUXxsfKQmlY1dj5iRFwCfQ7fy
oA2DJm/ETioKhE/2mbsaSjA=
=srlE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-DPV14H054FgJvjzgO88o--
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list