ports/88713: New port: archivers/linunace

[Pav Lucistnik]

Andrew P. píše v po 14. 11. 2005 v 10:43 +0300:
> On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > Andrew P. píše v ne 13. 11. 2005 v 20:47 +0300:
> > > On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > > Andrew P. píše v ne 13. 11. 2005 v 19:32 +0300:
> > > > > On 11/13/05, Pav Lucistnik <pav at freebsd.org> wrote:
> > > > > > Synopsis: New port: archivers/linunace
> > > > > >
> > > > > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > > > > > State-Changed-By: pav
> > > > > > State-Changed-When: Sun Nov 13 14:26:46 GMT 2005
> > > > > > State-Changed-Why:
> > > > > > New port added as archivers/linux-linunace (we prefix all linux binary ports
> > > > > > with linux- prefix)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=88713
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > I thought about it. Didn't know it was mandatory or
> > > > > something. So I'm sorry that it comes a bit late, but
> > > > > if you want to make it right, you'll have to move the
> > > > > port to archivers/linux-unace, change PORTNAME
> > > > > to unace and prefix DISTNAME with "lin".
> > > >
> > > > Ok renamed.
> >
> > > Thanks and wow, I didn't know that there used to be
> > > linux-unace before, and that you maintained it.
> >
> > Yes. It was for version 2.2 and at one point at time it stopped working
> > and no one knew why. So I agreed to delete it.
> >
> 
> - Raise PORTEPOCH
> 
> was that really necessary across resurrection?..
> More than a year has passed...

Script complained. You can't defy a machine.

-- 
Pav Lucistnik <pav at oook.cz>
              <pav at FreeBSD.org>

Every man is as God made him, ay, and often worse.
  -- Miguel de Cervantes
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: Toto je digit?ln? podepsan? ??st zpr?vy
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20051114/c85c376e/attachment.sig>