ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package

[Jose M Rodriguez]

The following reply was made to PR ports/81248; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Jose M Rodriguez <josemi at freebsd.jazztel.es>
To: Udo Schweigert <Udo.Schweigert at siemens.com>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/81248: [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package
Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 13:13:25 +0200

 El Jueves, 19 de Mayo de 2005 12:39, Udo Schweigert escribi=F3:
 > On Thu, May 19, 2005 at 10:40:43 +0200, Jose M Rodriguez wrote:
 > >>Number:         81248
 > >>Category:       ports
 > >>Synopsis:       [NEW PORT] mail/mutt-lite, a lite mutt package
 <snip/>
 >
 > I wouldn't object to this, although I don't see why we need that as a
 > port of it own. If that is added to the tree I would highly recommend
 > that the maintainer of the master and the slave port are the same.
 >
 
 I don't put any MAINTAINER line on the slave port, so the maintainer is=20
 the same of the main mutt port.
 
 The reason for this is to be able of doing 'pkg_add -r mutt-lite'. I use=20
 mutt as a tool for admins in machines that does't have any compiler=20
 installed (mainly dns/mail servers).
 
 =2D-
   josemi