ports/82389: portupgrade of linux-flashplugin7 to today's latest breaks flash on linux-opera

[Stacey Roberts]

The following reply was made to PR ports/82389; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Stacey Roberts <stacey at vickiandstacey.com>
To: Jeremy Messenger <mezz7 at cox.net>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at freebsd.org, freebsd-ports-bugs at freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/82389: portupgrade of linux-flashplugin7 to today's latest breaks flash on linux-opera
Date: Thu, 23 Jun 2005 05:59:45 +0100

 --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+
 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
 Content-Disposition: inline
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 Hi Jeremy!
     Thanks for the response.
 
 On Wed, 22 Jun 2005, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
 
 > On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 14:57:21 -0500, Stacey Roberts =20
 > <stacey at vickiandstacey.com> wrote:
 >=20
 > >Hi FreeBSD-gnats-submit!
 > >
 > >	An update after cvsup'ing to latest linux-opera today.
 > >
 > >On Sat, 18 Jun 2005, FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org wrote:
 > >
 > >>Thank you very much for your problem report.
 > >>It has the internal identification `ports/82389'.
 > >>The individual assigned to look at your
 > >>report is: freebsd-ports-bugs.
 > >>
 > >>You can access the state of your problem report at any time
 > >>via this link:
 > >>
 > >>http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D82389
 > >>
 > >>>Category:       ports
 > >>>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
 > >>>Synopsis:       portupgrade of linux-flashplugin7 to today's latest =
 =20
 > >>breaks flash on linux-opera
 > >>>Arrival-Date:   Sat Jun 18 14:10:00 GMT 2005
 > >
 > >
 > >Portupgrading linux-opera to latest in ports tree did *NOT* resolve the =
 =20
 > >fact that linux-flashplugin-6.0r79_3 is now broken after latest updates.
 >=20
 > I am confusing, I thought you said linux-flashplugin7? This is =20
 > linux-flashplugin6. I have no idea how well linux-flashplugin6 works, but=
  =20
 > I would recommend to use linux-flashplugin7 instead that I am using it =
 =20
 > everyday. It does work.
 
 Fair enough. When I originally noticed the problem, it actually *was* conce=
 rning a machine running linux-flashplugin7. However there are a few boxes h=
 ere with version 6 installed, one of which relates to my subsequent post ab=
 out the fact that the work-around I found for linux-flashplugin7 doesn't wo=
 rk for version 6.
 
 I will remove version 6, and install version 7.
 
 
 Thanks for the time.
 
 Regards,
 
 Stacey
 
 
 >=20
 > >BTW, the test that I'm running is going to http://www.macromedia.com =20
 > >which has a flash animation routine on its homepage that was viewable =
 =20
 > >before portupgrading linux-flashplugin on that box recently.
 >=20
 > Works fine with linux-flashplugin7.
 >=20
 > Cheers,
 > Mezz
 >=20
 > >If there is anything else I can test, please let me know.
 > >
 > >Regards,
 > >
 > >Stacey
 >=20
 >=20
 > --=20
 > mezz7 at cox.net  -  mezz at FreeBSD.org
 > FreeBSD GNOME Team
 > http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/  -  gnome at FreeBSD.org
 >=20
 
 --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 Content-Disposition: inline
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: PGP 6.5.8
 
 iQEVAwUBQrpButetyy/wI4UpAQE17Qf+KV4PvR5jLudt8iM4yROJwhJGY5TyZMY5
 qmJbvKOwYxa7es6Yc+/LLd4C91siiKwbBu46kwp7v0c9V4CwGqpoU1TUI+w29X4l
 HtPqohtP7Q7claq7dQkDaOaExDcisDFx6LM5T+MNA0C40dCCagdBdE+leL3J0WZE
 5ggh/bziJTDKgYX+xY0Eew4+u0SnfM7yBp7E1xDx2e1hJA6CX/9pFJLfQUwOrt4B
 SZFKI6N5MuxFZrUkCxgY9MfPgyguF3K5GA9LpOoMj+QevghT2LAqczgJQIYqPfIG
 m73sTmT2zloDcTVqR4RRAv2xnGbZuwbouApk4wXT9tbebYPLNBookA==
 =q0e/
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 --gDGSpKKIBgtShtf+--