ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng

[Vasil Dimov]

The following reply was made to PR ports/82235; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Vasil Dimov <vd at datamax.bg>
To: Vsevolod Stakhov <vsevolod at highsecure.ru>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2005 09:29:24 +0300

 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 Hash: SHA1
 
 Ok, let's end that useless conversation about the color of mutt-ng.
 
 > Mutt next generation (mutt-ng) is a fork of the well-known email client mutt
 > with the goal to both incorporate all the patches that are floating around in
 > the web, and to fix all the other little annoyances of mutt. Also this port is
 > using options structure that is more comfortable for some people including me.
 
 Name those "little annoyances of mutt", that mutt-ng fixes.
 The new features mutt-ng introduces and why are they useful. Also
 explain the situation when mutt crashes and mutt-ng does not. If this
 really happens with the latest version of mutt, consider sending a PR
 anyway, no matter whether mutt-ng enters /usr/ports/ or not.
 
 For example:
 1. mutt and mutt-devel do A when I expect them to do B, which I find
    very annoying. This cannot be tuned via muttrc.
 2. mutt-ng has this nice thing C that I use when I need to do D, this
    feature cannot be found in mail/mutt/files/ nor in
    mail/mutt-devel/files/.
 3. etc. etc. etc.
 
 Just convince us that mutt-ng really worths.
 
 Regards,
 Vasil
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 
 iD8DBQFCsRxEFw6SP/bBpCARAqPWAKC4YSQkAIk0uMn2L095NgKPt3mzSQCeMzaK
 cYWfc2gdGo/6/2ODEaSNMqU=
 =KtfH
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----