ports/82235: New port: mail/mutt-ng

[Sergey Matveychuk]

Anton Berezin wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 15, 2005 at 11:06:23AM +0200, Udo Schweigert wrote:
> 
> 
>>As the maintainer of the mutt ports I vote against it.
> 
> 
> I don't think it is a reasonable position.  There will undoubtedly be a
> number of people willing to give it a try, and the rest is just politics
> better to be avoided in the ports tree.

Agree. If it's an official fork, why we can't have the separate port?

-- 
Sem.