ports/79567: New Port: textproc/p5-XML-RSS-Parser A liberal object-oriented parser for RSS feeds

[Alexander Zhuravlev]

The following reply was made to PR ports/79567; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Alexander Zhuravlev <zaa at ulstu.ru>
To: Anton Berezin <tobez at tobez.org>, FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Cc:  
Subject: Re: ports/79567: New Port: textproc/p5-XML-RSS-Parser  A liberal object-oriented parser for RSS feeds
Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2005 16:44:49 +0400

 On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:36:31PM +0200, Anton Berezin wrote:
 > On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:17:14PM +0400, Alexander Zhuravlev wrote:
 > > 
 > > >Number:         79567
 > > >Category:       ports
 > > >Synopsis:       New Port: textproc/p5-XML-RSS-Parser  A liberal object-oriented parser for RSS feeds
 > > >Confidential:   no
 > > >Severity:       non-critical
 > > >Priority:       medium
 > > >Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
 > > >State:          open
 > > >Quarter:        
 > > >Keywords:       
 > > >Date-Required:
 > > >Class:          change-request
 > > >Submitter-Id:   current-users
 > > >Arrival-Date:   Tue Apr 05 18:20:05 GMT 2005
 > > >Closed-Date:
 > > >Last-Modified:
 > > >Originator:     Alexander Zhuravlev
 > > >Release:        FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE i386
 > > >Organization:
 > > >Environment:
 > > System: FreeBSD orion.ulstu.ru 4.11-STABLE FreeBSD 4.11-STABLE #4: Tue Jan 11 18:20:14 MSK 2005 root at orion.ulstu.ru:/usr/src/sys/compile/ORION i386
 > > 
 > > 
 > > 	
 > > >Description:
 > > 	New port submition.
 > > 	textproc/p5-XML-RSS-Parser  A liberal object-oriented parser for RSS feeds
 > 
 > > XPORTVERSION=	2.15
 > 
 > This is from
 > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/textproc/p5-XML-RSS-Parser/Attic/Makefile?hideattic=0
 > 
 > 	Revision 1.8, Wed Oct 13 08:06:03 2004 UTC (5 months, 3 weeks ago) by
 > 	arved
 > 	Branch: MAIN
 > 	CVS Tags: HEAD
 > 	Changes since 1.7: +1 -1 lines
 > 	FILE REMOVED
 > 
 > 	Remove this ports.
 > 	Version 3 of this module is now part of the p5-XML-RAI port
 > 
 > 	Approved by:    clsung (Maintainer)
 > 
 > Is there a good reason for this port to be resurrected?
 
 	Sorry, I was not aware of this change.
 	In this case there is no reason to re-add this port.
 
 --
 Alexander Zhuravlev
 Ulyanovsk State Technical University
 NOC, System administrator