ports/63767: [MAINTAINER] irc/eggdrop: Add SSL support

[Ulrich Spoerlein]

On Thu, 04.03.2004 at 12:31:34 -0800, Kirill Ponomarew wrote:
> Is it not better to move PATCH_* knobs to WITH_SSL option.
> The users should decide whether they need it or not.

This would require two different sets of patches, because files/patch-*
are affected by the SSL-Patch too. Now what shall I do? Provide two
versions of nearly all the patch-?? files? Rework the SSL-Patch on my own
and upload it somewhere? Or better take the whole files/* dir and
provide a big FreeBSD.patch and FreeBSD-SSL.patch and upload them
somewhere?

Ulrich Spoerlein
-- 
PGP Key ID: F0DB9F44				Get it while it's hot!
PGP Fingerprint: F1CE D062 0CA9 ADE3 349B  2FE8 980A C6B5 F0DB 9F44
I abhor a system designed for the "user", if that word is a coded
pejorative meaning "stupid and unsophisticated".	-- Ken Thompson
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20040305/dbc5f5b5/attachment.sig>