ports/69118: [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Patch x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp to 1.0_1

[John Merryweather Cooper]

On Thu, 2004-07-15 at 14:50, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> The following reply was made to PR ports/69118; it has been noted by GNATS.
> 
> From: "Jeremy Messenger" <mezz7 at cox.net>
> To: freebsd-gnats-submit at freebsd.org, johnmary at adelphia.net
> Cc:  
> Subject: Re: ports/69118: [MAINTAINER-UPDATE] Patch x11-toolkits/gtk-sharp to 1.0_1
> Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 16:47:39 -0500
> 
>  Ouch, it is not pretty for have the hardcore stuff.. Umm, can you point on  
>  something like libgtk-x11-2.0.so instead libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400? This will  
>  help for no conflict with the GNOME 2.7/2.8. The libgtk-x11-2.0.so is just  
>  a symlink that point on libgtk-x11-2.0.so.400.
>  
>  -libgdk-x11-2.0 at LIB_PREFIX@.400 at LIB_SUFFIX@
>  +libgdk-x11-2.0 at LIB_PREFIX@@LIB_SUFFIX@
>  
>  Will this work and any thought? I am not even sure if I am right or wrong,  
>  so I will leave that to the other committers. :-)
>  
>  Cheers,
>  Mezz
>  
> 
>  -- 
>  mezz7 at cox.net  -  mezz at FreeBSD.org
>  FreeBSD GNOME Team
>  http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - gnome at FreeBSD.org

In principle, you could, but I don't think it saves you very much. 
Unless gtk-sharp itself adopts a more stable means of determining the
shared object names (actually, for gtkhtml-3 it does O.K.--for some
reason they treated this library special) either the maintainer (me) or
a Gnome committer is going to have to hack the XML each time to remove
the hard-coded ABI numbers.  I don't think it's much of a "win" either
way.

jmc

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 187 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/attachments/20040715/67a785f6/attachment.sig>