ports/60988: PATCH: fix build of grub-0.92
nate at root.org
Tue Jan 6 21:30:22 UTC 2004
The following reply was made to PR ports/60988; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Nate Lawson <nate at root.org>
To: Thierry Thomas <thierry at pompo.net>
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/60988: PATCH: fix build of grub-0.92
Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 13:28:13 -0800 (PST)
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Mar 6 jan 04 =E0 20:24:29 +0100, Nate Lawson <nate at root.org>
> > >Number: 60988
> > >Category: ports
> > >Synopsis: PATCH: fix build of grub-0.92
> > >Confidential: no
> > >Severity: serious
> > >Priority: medium
> > >Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
> > >State: open
> > >Quarter:
> > >Keywords:
> > >Date-Required:
> > >Class: sw-bug
> > >Submitter-Id: current-users
> > >Arrival-Date: Tue Jan 06 11:30:15 PST 2004
> > >Closed-Date:
> > >Last-Modified:
> > >Originator: Nate Lawson
> > >Release: FreeBSD 5.2-CURRENT i386
> > >Organization:
> > FreeBSD
> > >Environment:
> > System:
> > >Description:
> > =09grub-0.92 port is broken on 5-CURRENT. Attached patches below
> > =09fix the build. I don't have reiserfs so someone should test it
> > =09but I believe the patch to it is simple.
> Note that 0.92 is outdated, 0.93 has been released on 08.12.2002.
I know. First things first. Feel free to submit patches for building
> Meanwhile, I think that it should remain marked "broken", because AFAIK
> it does not support UFS2.
There are plenty of us using UFS1 and 5-CURRENT since we don't need the
ACLs feature and the root (or /boot) partition is small enough that there
is no benefit from the larger tables.
Again, the first thing is to get the existing grub-0.92 compiling again,
then grub-0.93, then UFS2, ...
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs