ports/75551: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry in the port's Makefile since a files/patch-* seems to do the same thing.
Ion-Mihai Tetcu
itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Tue Dec 28 19:48:29 UTC 2004
On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:26:27 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:
> Julien Gabel pí¹e v út 28. 12. 2004 v 20:23 +0100:
>
> > > And in last row, it creates a lot of administrative overhead for us,
> > > committers.
> >
> > Sorry for the overhead.
>
> Don't apologize, you did nothing wrong. Always better than to not trying
> at all to fix issues you encounter.
And is probably my fault as after a few weeks of misfield/mismailed
Q and As I've added this in the pkg-message:
>>>
Reporting problems, asking questions:
- small typos, etc. to the maintainer
- FreeBSD specific port-related problems/questions: ports@, maintainer cc'ed
- FreeBSD specific patches, doc enhancements: send-pr maintainer cc'ed
- dspam specific questions: dspam mailling list (maintainer cc'ed if you like)
- dspam specific patches: dspam/dspam-dev mailling list (maintainer cc'ed if you like)
Please be sure to include in your email/pr relevant information such as:
uname -a, dspam --version, /var/db/ports/dspam-devel/options, MTA setup.
If needed rebuild WITH_DEBUG and to turn on debugging see DebugOpt in dsapm.conf
Please send unified diff's (diff -u).
>>>
I guess I should change it, right ?
--
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list