ports/75551: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry in the port's Makefile since a files/patch-* seems to do the same thing.

Ion-Mihai Tetcu itetcu at people.tecnik93.com
Tue Dec 28 19:48:29 UTC 2004


On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 20:26:27 +0100
Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Julien Gabel pí¹e v út 28. 12. 2004 v 20:23 +0100:
> 
> > > And in last row, it creates a lot of administrative overhead for us,
> > > committers.
> > 
> > Sorry for the overhead.
> 
> Don't apologize, you did nothing wrong. Always better than to not trying
> at all to fix issues you encounter.

And is probably my fault as after a few weeks of misfield/mismailed
Q and As I've added this in the pkg-message:

>>>
 Reporting problems, asking questions:
 - small typos, etc. to the maintainer
 - FreeBSD specific port-related problems/questions: ports@, maintainer cc'ed
 - FreeBSD specific patches, doc enhancements: send-pr maintainer cc'ed
 - dspam specific questions: dspam mailling list (maintainer cc'ed if you like)
 - dspam specific patches: dspam/dspam-dev mailling list (maintainer cc'ed if you like)
 Please be sure to include in your email/pr relevant information such as:
 uname -a, dspam --version, /var/db/ports/dspam-devel/options, MTA setup.
 If needed rebuild WITH_DEBUG and to turn on debugging see DebugOpt in dsapm.conf

 Please send unified diff's (diff -u).
>>>

I guess I should change it, right ?


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"




More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list