ports/75551: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry in the port's Makefile since a files/patch-* seems to do the same thing.

[Ion-Mihai Tetcu]

On Tue, 28 Dec 2004 16:59:38 GMT
Pav Lucistnik <pav at FreeBSD.org> wrote:

> Synopsis: [PATCH] Correct a 'post-patch' entry in the port's Makefile since a files/patch-* seems to do the same thing.
> 
> State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> State-Changed-By: pav
> State-Changed-When: Tue Dec 28 16:59:05 GMT 2004
> State-Changed-Why: 
> Maintainer promised to integrate this patch into his next update.

Pav, why is the state "close" more appropriate that analyzed ?
I mean I could forget about them ;)

> (Bottom line here is that you should approach maintainer directly,
> without the detour via send-pr)

For two stylistic ones yes, but for the dir permissions (75549) and
"UntrustedDeliveryAgent" and "QuarantineAgent  (75548), I tend to
believe a pr is OK.


-- 
IOnut
Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user"