ports/57595: [patch] mark lang/rscheme as only for i386

[Mark Linimon]

>Number:         57595
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       [patch] mark lang/rscheme as only for i386
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       non-critical
>Priority:       low
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          change-request
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Sat Oct 04 23:40:13 PDT 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Mark Linimon
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE i386
>Organization:
Lonesome Dove Computing Services
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD lonesome.lonesome.com 4.9-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 4.9-PRERELEASE #0: Fri Sep 5 01:19:33 CDT 2003 linimon at lonesome.lonesome.com:/usr/src/sys/compile/MULTIMEDIA_DEBUG i386
>Description:
	Per bento, this port gets either signal 11 or signal 4 when
	trying to install on non-i386.  Mark it to warn the unwary.
	Since it doesn't have a maintainer, I guess you could go either
	way on whether it should be "broken" or "ignore".
>How-To-Repeat:
	make install (non-i386)
>Fix:

--- rscheme/Makefile.dist	Sun Aug 31 00:44:58 2003
+++ rscheme/Makefile	Sun Oct  5 01:14:26 2003
@@ -15,6 +15,10 @@
 MAINTAINER=	ports at FreeBSD.org
 COMMENT=	An object-oriented, extended version of the Scheme dialect of Lisp
 
+.if ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "i386"
+BROKEN=		"fails to install on ${ARCH}"
+.endif
+
 WRKSRC=		${WRKDIR}/${DISTNAME}/src
 
 HAS_CONFIGURE=	yes
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted: