ports/59150: Revive sysutils/clean...

[Charles Swiger]

>Number:         59150
>Category:       ports
>Synopsis:       Revive sysutils/clean...
>Confidential:   no
>Severity:       serious
>Priority:       medium
>Responsible:    freebsd-ports-bugs
>State:          open
>Quarter:        
>Keywords:       
>Date-Required:
>Class:          maintainer-update
>Submitter-Id:   current-users
>Arrival-Date:   Mon Nov 10 15:00:38 PST 2003
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator:     Charles Swiger
>Release:        FreeBSD 4.9-RC i386
>Organization:
PKIx
>Environment:
System: FreeBSD ns1.pkix.net 4.9-RC FreeBSD 4.9-RC #5: Fri Oct 17 18:45:19 EDT 2003 root at ns1.pkix.net:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/NORMAL i386

>Description:

Please refer to original submission, ports/52881, and recent email on the
<ports at freebsd.org> mailing list:

On Nov 7, 2003, at 9:06 PM, Oliver Eikemeier wrote (in response to me):
>How-To-Repeat:

N/A.

>Fix:

The port as submitted (using the name "clean", not "clean_") should work, but
diffs from the current state follow:

--- clean_/Makefile	Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003
+++ clean/Makefile	Mon Nov 10 17:51:33 2003
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
 #
 # $FreeBSD: ports/sysutils/clean_/Makefile,v 1.2 2003/10/06 00:50:47 edwin Exp $
 
-PORTNAME= 	clean_
+PORTNAME= 	clean
 PORTVERSION=	3.2
 CATEGORIES=	sysutils
 MASTER_SITES=	${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE}

...or:

--- clean_/Makefile	Mon Nov 10 17:50:39 2003
+++ clean/Makefile	Mon Nov 10 17:54:46 2003
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
 PORTVERSION=	3.2
 CATEGORIES=	sysutils
 MASTER_SITES=	${MASTER_SITE_SOURCEFORGE}
-MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= ${PORTNAME}
+MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR= clean
 DISTNAME=	clean-${PORTVERSION}
 
 MAINTAINER=	chuck at pkix.net
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
 >> To recap: the port as submitted works fine, but the name 'clean' broke the
 >> generation of the ports INDEX.  I believe the port was renamed in CVS via a
 >> repocopy to 'clean_', while Oliver Eikemeier kindly looked into and produced
 >> a patch to bsd.port.subdir.mk which seemed to resolve the bug with
 >> generating INDEX.  What I should do next to address Bill Fenner's scripted
 >> email...?  :-)
 >
 > You have three possibilities, listed in order of (my personal) preference:
 >
 > 1.) You could revive sysutils/clean, it should work now (PR 57438 is
 >     committed)
 > 2.) You could name your port clean instead of clean_
 > 3.) You could use clean instead of ${PORTNAME} for MASTER_SITE_SUBDIR