ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion

Kirk Strauser kirk at strauser.com
Fri Jun 6 00:00:28 UTC 2003


The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Kirk Strauser <kirk at strauser.com>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem at ciam.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org, ports at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 18:52:12 -0500

 --=-=-=
 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
 
 At 2003-06-05T23:08:45Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem at ciam.ru> writes:
 
 > I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has
 > changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA?
 
 Actually, I used vim and send-pr to send the PR.  However, I *did* do some
 copy-and-pasting in Konsole, and that might've been the problem.
 
 > Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without
 > putting path to it into $PATH.  If so port will satisfied. But if the port
 > will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's
 > reasonable.
 
 OK, I agree that's reasonable.
 =2D-=20
 Kirk Strauser
 
 --=-=-=
 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
 
 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
 Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
 
 iD8DBQA+39ez5sRg+Y0CpvERAmJGAJ9RfYq/j8jtFDdHoAE8N7SR1guCggCfXEC6
 msGUMYkLMEsT/+9INWVcHAc=
 =twZy
 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
 --=-=-=--
 



More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs mailing list