ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Kirk Strauser
kirk at strauser.com
Fri Jun 6 00:00:28 UTC 2003
The following reply was made to PR ports/52790; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: Kirk Strauser <kirk at strauser.com>
To: Sergey Matveychuk <sem at ciam.ru>
Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit at FreeBSD.org, ports at FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2003 18:52:12 -0500
--=-=-=
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
At 2003-06-05T23:08:45Z, Sergey Matveychuk <sem at ciam.ru> writes:
> I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has
> changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA?
Actually, I used vim and send-pr to send the PR. However, I *did* do some
copy-and-pasting in Konsole, and that might've been the problem.
> Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without
> putting path to it into $PATH. If so port will satisfied. But if the port
> will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's
> reasonable.
OK, I agree that's reasonable.
=2D-=20
Kirk Strauser
--=-=-=
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.2 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQA+39ez5sRg+Y0CpvERAmJGAJ9RfYq/j8jtFDdHoAE8N7SR1guCggCfXEC6
msGUMYkLMEsT/+9INWVcHAc=
=twZy
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--=-=-=--
More information about the freebsd-ports-bugs
mailing list