reply-to speed issue

Michael Zimmer drakyri at hotmail.com
Wed Jun 18 22:17:35 UTC 2008


I don't know if this is restricted to reply-to.  I have an almost identical setup (except, using route-to) and have the same problem.  Anyone have any ideas?
 
thanks,
 
-mike> Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:59:13 +0400> From: lan at rcfd.spb.ru> To: freebsd-pf at freebsd.org> Subject: reply-to speed issue> > Hello!> > I have a freebsd box (7-release) acting as gateway.> The topology is very simple. There are 2 ifaces: em0 and em1, pointing to> gateway 1 (gw1) and gw2 correspondingly. Here is the "picture":> > ,------------.> (internal LAN)---* FreeBSD/pf *---(WAN / gw1), $ext_if1, $ext_ip1> | *---(WAN / gw2), $ext_if2, $ext_ip2> `------------'> > There are some servers inside internal LAN, so I have to respond the> request from WAN to the same iface. Well, I need following lines inside my> pf.conf:> > nat on $ext_if1 from !(self) to any -> ($ext_if1:0)> nat on $ext_if2 from !(self) to any -> ($ext_if2:0)> > # example of some internal service, hosted inside the LAN> rdr on $ext_if1 proto tcp to port $someport tag IF_1 \> -> $ip_internal port $someport> rdr on $ext_if2 proto tcp to port $someport tag IF_2 \> -> $ip_internal port $someport> > block in all> block out all> > # example of common services, hosted on freebsd box> pass in on $ext_if1 reply-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) \> proto tcp from <ext_white_ftp> \> to $ext_ip1 port { ftp, ftp-data, 45000:50000 } \> flags S/SA keep state> pass in on $ext_if2 reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) \> proto tcp from <ext_white_ftp> \> to $ext_ip2 port { ftp, ftp-data, 45000:50000 } \> flags S/SA keep state> > pass in quick reply-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) proto { udp, icmp } \> tagged IF_1 keep state> pass in quick reply-to ($ext_if1 $ext_gw1) proto tcp \> tagged IF_1 flags S/SA keep state> pass in quick reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) proto { udp, icmp } \> tagged IF_2 keep state> pass in quick reply-to ($ext_if2 $ext_gw2) proto tcp \> tagged IF_2 flags S/SA keep state> > Now it works. Connections from outside to both hosted @box & hosted @LAN> are estabilishing, data flows, but... strange speed issue detected.> Let's shut down pf (pfctl -d) and ftp to any of external ifaces: full> speed of iface in both directions.> Let's enable pf again, but use pf.conf without any "reply-to"> ("route-to"s are still at their places): oops, something wrong with> outgoing stream. Look at this numbers: approx. 60kBytes/sec w/o "reply-to"> and only 3kBytes/sec with it. Not very nice, isn't it...> > Let me say some words about the box itself.> box: SMP system on single core2duo CPU, 2 em & 1 rl nics.> freebsd: default sysctl setup, custom kernel built using GENERIC with> following difference:> options SCHED_ULE> device pf> options ALTQ> options ALTQ_CBQ> options ALTQ_RED> options ALTQ_RIO> options ALTQ_HFSC> options ALTQ_CDNR> options ALTQ_PRIQ> options ALTQ_NOPCC> pf: No queues running, very (less than 10 items) small tables, near 120> rules in pf.conf.> > Here the question begins: what is the source of such a problem with> "reply-to". What should I test, may be on another box or in lab? What> manuals should I learn before configure pf any more if there are config> mistakes?> > -- > wbr, Alexey.> > > > _______________________________________________> freebsd-pf at freebsd.org mailing list> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe at freebsd.org"
_________________________________________________________________
The other season of giving begins 6/24/08. Check out the i’m Talkathon.
http://www.imtalkathon.com?source=TXT_EML_WLH_SeasonOfGiving


More information about the freebsd-pf mailing list