Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
Christopher J. Ruwe
cjr at cruwe.de
Fri Jan 7 15:05:40 UTC 2011
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
On Fri, 7 Jan 2011 06:12:38 -0800 (PST)
Paul Pathiakis <pathiaki2 at yahoo.com> wrote:
> This is almost laughable. I'd like to know what parameters they were
> tuning.
Some time ago Phoronix compared a FreeBSD with kernel debugging turned
on to an Ubuntu to show that FreeBSD is slow and Linuxes way faster.
Since then I have privately dubbed that site Moronix.
--
Christopher J. Ruwe
TZ GMT + 1
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 834 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20110107/c87f289e/signature.pgp
- Previous message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Next message: Phoronix comparision of HAMMER, UFS, ZFS, EXT3, EXT4, Btrfs
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list