Possible evidence of performance regression for 8.1-S (vs. 7.1)

[David Wolfskill]

On Wed, Oct 27, 2010 at 11:46:33AM -0400, Mike Tancsa wrote:
> 
> I did some very simple numbers to compare RELENG_7 and RELENG_8 
> i386....  But cpu and 
> memory driven tests all seem to be about the same and the disk io 
> differences are pretty small.
> ...

This is good to know, but please note that what I was testing and
reporting was:

* release/7.1.0, with the following merged in:
  r186860 from stable/7
  r190970 from stable/7
  r203072 from head
  r209964 from stable/7
  and using the MAC kernel config

* stable/8 @r214029 using the GENERIC kernel config

Peace,
david
-- 
David H. Wolfskill				david at catwhisker.org
Depriving a girl or boy of an opportunity for education is evil.

See http://www.catwhisker.org/~david/publickey.gpg for my public key.
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 196 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-performance/attachments/20101027/8574cd13/attachment.pgp