System perforamance 4.x vs. 5.x and 6.x

[Andre Albsmeier]

On Tue, 22-Apr-2008 at 14:54:07 +0300, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 12:31:45PM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote:
> > On Thu, 21-Feb-2008 at 14:13:22 +0200, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > On Thu, Feb 21, 2008 at 04:20:04AM -0700, Brett Bump wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > On Wed, 20 Feb 2008, Kostik Belousov wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > > I cannot reproduce it locally. With patch applied, it compiles both
> > > > > GENERIC and GENERIC with options QUOTA added just fine.
> > > > >
> > > > > Check for partially applied patch.
> > > > >
> > > > 
> > > > Thanks Kostik.  You can double check me on sizes, but it would appear that
> > > > all files in the patch were touched, and I double checked my sources with:
> > > > ftp://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/i386/6.2-RELEASE/src which are
> > > The patch is against RELENG_6, not against RELENG_6_2. I see no point
> > > in backporting it to RELENG_6_2.
> > > 
> > > BTW, I backported two fixes, one for another deadlock with snapshots and
> > > quotas, another for "ffs_blkfree: block already freed" panic and followed
> > > up fsck: softdep inconsistency error.
> > > 
> > > New combined patch (against RELENG_6) is at
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080221-1202.patch
> > 
> > I tried to apply this patch to recent RELENG_6 sources
> > but it failed at a lot of places. I think this is due to
> > changes to the tree after the above patch was made.
> > 
> > Is there any newer patch available or is it possible to make
> > one which applies to recent RELENG_6 sources?
> 
> http://people.freebsd.org/~kib/quotagiant/quotas-RELENG_6-20080422-1000.patch

That was a quick one, thanks a lot!

	-Andre

> 
> May be, I shall commit it finally.



-- 
GNU is Not Unix / Linux Is Not UniX