Dual-core CPU vs. very large cache
Mike Jakubik
mikej at rogers.com
Wed Apr 26 14:52:01 UTC 2006
David Gilbert wrote:
> This isn't random. As I understand the issue, the Opteron HT bus
> handles synchronization much faster. So for a game --- this doesn't
> matter ... games don't (usually) need sync. Databases, however, live
> on synchonizaton. If you're a Dell man (and already paying the Dell
> tax), consider the Sun 1U's. They offer up to 4 cores in a 1U.
>
Sure, the HTT bus is wonderful. Intel will raise the FSB to 1067, but i
still think we will see significant performance improvements on the new
Core architecture. The Conroe CPU throughly trashes an AMD Athlon-X2 at
a "higher" frequency. For those interested:
http://www.anandtech.com/tradeshows/showdoc.aspx?i=2713
As much as i love AMDs cpus, the availability of good server
motherboards and chipsets stinks, hopefully that will change when socket
AM2 comes out.
More information about the freebsd-performance
mailing list